Essay on Handwriting

After the exhibition, when packaging
the paper works for shipment in shallow 
white containers, the sculptor photographed 
my hands in labeling motions, the pen 
anxious, not meaning to pierce discrete holes 
in the foam board, a system of strictly 
useless marks. On days she taught she’d leave me 
lists on blue-lined paper I’d photograph
like tousled bed sheets. Handwriting presents 
various archival problematics, what with its 
errors, stains, tears, idiosyncrasies— 
How plausible a reader’s fictions seem 
off the inky reflective surfaces. 
Someone wearing a dark hood interrupts
my writing, traveling to New York, to say, “I 
like your scriptures,” meaning my “handwriting,”
which is illegible, resembling 
no received system. My pen doesn’t lift
between letters slanting keenly over 
the dotted line. I sit alone atop 
the staircase at the book launch, leaving room 
for couples, late arrivals. In between 
recitations accompanied by jazz,
the poet makes a case for what is lost 
in copying one’s manuscript for print. 
She prefers the poet’s page, the first draft
on a receipt, palm, or napkin carried
away by wind on which an aural trace 
may or may not remain, prefers handwriting, 
its potential transmitting of voice, voice 
as in sound, rather than the mastering
and forceful exactness of type, citing 
an early draft of the famous poem 
to which a peer added a humorous, 
scathing criticism in the margins 
reproduced in no published edition.
I scrawled questions in my notes, not looking 
at the page but at the poet who met 
my gaze as she pronounced “Herodotus”
“Parmenides,” and again with “dildo.” 
I imagined her wielding that rigid
logic in conversation over tea, 
that we’d discuss her theory of eros, 
her disdain for history and later, 
the servers inverting their chairs, she’d ask 
to hear a poem. I’d feign bashfulness, 
concede a sonnet. All that night we’d have 
spoken with our forearms on the table, 
but she would straighten then, watch my mouth move,
recognizing, and after say something   
affirmative but impenetrable,
like, “Ah, there it is,” or, “Well, here we are,”
before penning on a torn piece of blue- 
lined paper her phone number or address, 
a detail I, spun dizzy by my pride 
and tenable ambitions, wouldn’t think 
to probe until morning, until too late,
the poet gone, having left useless marks— 
Would be cast back then, into the lawless 
grief that is desire without object— 
But the recitation ends, the staircase 
empties, the allotted time for questions 
over. The audience forms a trill-less 
curving “R” weaving through the bookcases,  
each of them longing for her signature 
or a brief exchange of words. The next day
while reviewing my notes, I struggled 
to articulate one letter form from
the next, the letter forms depending on
their edges—Those piercing impalpable
edges, what always eluded me—Where  
does a person end and world begin? Who
was that, writing from the staircase with such
rapacious abandon? That "I" forgot 
to cross each low “t,” which bled into low 
“h’s,” so that all the “the’s” read like “me’s.”